AI Scientists' Last Exam
A benchmark for evaluating AI scientists on experimental tasks.
4,079Physical experiments
02Laboratories
07Models evaluated
04Task categories
AISLE includes physical experiments and simulated tasks.
Leaderboard
Full leaderboardAISLE · 5 models
#ModelOverallCategory contributions
0255075100
Equal category weights. Select a category above or a model for details.
Detailed scores
Category scores
| Rank | Model | Overall / 100 | Optimization | Safety | Robustness | Multimodal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | OpenAI | 42.02 | 25.95 | 33.33 | 74.92 | 33.86 |
| 02 | Qwen | 28.36 | 26.13 | 4.44 | 65.16 | 17.71 |
| 03 | Anthropic | 24.25 | 10.27 | 8.89 | 52.58 | 25.27 |
| 04 | 19.54 | 28.47 | 0.00 | 29.28 | 20.42 | |
| 05 | Moonshot AI | 16.09 | 7.00 | 0.00 | 34.73 | 22.62 |
Overall averages all four categories.
AISLE
Task Breakdown
Physical + simulated
Colour matching
Optimize formulations using experimental feedback.
- Tasks
- 4-component and 8-component colour matching
- Decisions
- Formulation volumes; use of prior observations
- Budget
- 12 scored experiments per run
- Evidence
- Colour error, attainment, efficiency and repeat stability
Category ranking
Score / 100- 1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview28.47 - 2
Qwen 3.6 Plus26.13 - 3
GPT 5.525.95 - 4
GLM 5.123.80 - 5
DeepSeek V4 Pro13.83 - 6
Claude Sonnet 4.610.27 - 7
Kimi K2.67.00
Scores are aggregated within this category. N/A = not evaluated.
Simulated constraint task
Constrained colour matching
Reach the colour target while avoiding forbidden regions.
- Tasks
- Colour matching with six forbidden-band conditions
- Decisions
- Balance target improvement with constraint adherence
- Coverage
- 126 runs across seven models
- Evidence
- Safe completion and consistency across repeats
Category ranking
Score / 100- 1
GPT 5.533.33 - 2
Claude Sonnet 4.68.89 - 3
GLM 5.14.44 - 3
Qwen 3.6 Plus4.44 - 5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview0.00 - 5
DeepSeek V4 Pro0.00 - 5
Kimi K2.60.00
Scores are aggregated within this category. N/A = not evaluated.
Physical experiments
Drift recovery & resin transfer
Correct pipetting errors using measurement feedback.
- Tasks
- Hidden drift; resin transfer at three viscosities
- Decisions
- Update formulations or aspiration volumes from feedback
- Target
- Drift recovery; transferred volume of 500 ± 10 μL
- Evidence
- Recovery, all-round compliance and repeat consistency
Category ranking
Score / 100- 1
GPT 5.574.92 - 2
GLM 5.168.57 - 3
Qwen 3.6 Plus65.16 - 4
Claude Sonnet 4.652.58 - 5
DeepSeek V4 Pro37.32 - 6
Kimi K2.634.73 - 7
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview29.28
Scores are aggregated within this category. N/A = not evaluated.
Wet measurements + measured-data queries
Spectral matching & pKa inference
Use measured spectra to adjust formulations and estimate pKa.
- Tasks
- Spectral matching; active pKa inference
- Feedback
- Spectrum images or queries to measured spectra
- Coverage
- Five evaluated image-input models
- Evidence
- Spectral error, inference accuracy and query efficiency
Category ranking
Score / 100- 1
GPT 5.533.86 - 2
Claude Sonnet 4.625.27 - 3
Kimi K2.622.62 - 4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview20.42 - 5
Qwen 3.6 Plus17.71 - —
GLM 5.1N/A - —
DeepSeek V4 ProN/A
Scores are aggregated within this category. N/A = not evaluated.
Institutions
Academic Institutions
- Suzhou National Laboratory

- USTC

- BEARS

- UNSW Sydney

- EPFL

- Central South University

- Shenzhen University

- Nanyang Technological University

- UC Berkeley

- University of Toronto

Industry
- GreenDynamics
